What is Surgical Scaffold? | Monofilament Mesh for Reconstructive Surgery

Home The P4HB Scaffold Collection What is a Galatea Scaffold?

Elevate. Support. Repair. Reinforce.

Galatea Surgical offers non-cadaveric, non-human, non-animal, biologically derived scaffolds for plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures that provide immediate elevation and reinforcement of soft tissue.

Indications for Use

GalaFLEX, GalaFLEX 3D and GalaFLEX 3DR (Galatea scaffolds) are indicated for use as a bioresorbable scaffold for soft tissue support and to repair, elevate, and reinforce deficiencies where weakness or voids exist that require the addition of material to obtain the desired surgical outcome. This includes reinforcement of soft tissue in plastic and reconstructive surgery, and general soft tissue reconstruction. Galatea scaffold is also indicated for the repair of fascial defects that require the addition of a reinforcing or bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result.

Galatea Scaffold Monofilament Construction – Photo 20x

The Galatea collection of scaffolds offers a unique combination of properties that are designed for soft tissue reinforcement in plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures.

Biologically Derived

Produced by a safe biological fermentation process, standard in pharmaceutical production. ^{[12, 17]}

Monofilament

Designed to minimize risk of infection and encourage a natural healing response. ^{[3, 15]}

Strong

Provides a lattice for new tissue ingrowth and regeneration resulting in tissue 3-4x stronger than native tissue. ^{[9, 16, 19]}

Bioresorbable

Naturally broken down to CO2 and H2O and bioresorption is essentially complete by 18-24 months. ^[1,12]

3-Dimensional

The first and only formed absorbable scaffold designed to fit and uplift the body's natural shape, providing easier placement and reduced procedure time. ^[1]

See how Galatea surgical scaffolds work.

Find out why you should use Galatea scaffolds to support your next surgical procedure.

+ Show References

1. Data on file at Tepha.
*2. Preclinical data on file at Tepha; results may not correlate to clinical performance in humans.
3. Engelsman, A. F., van der Mei, H. C., Ploeg, R. J., & Busscher, H. J. “The Phenomenon of Infection with Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.” Biomaterials, vol. 28 no. 14, 2018, pp. 2314-2327.
4. Loh, Q. L., Choong, C.. “Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size.” Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, vol. 19, no. 6, 2013, pp. 485-502. doi:http://dx.doi.org.portal.lib.fit.edu/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437
5. Alloderm Regenerative Tissue Matrix, Lifecell Electronic IFU. https://allergan-web-cdn-prod.azureedge.net/actavis/.
6. Amid, P. K. . “Classification of Biomaterials and Their Related Complications in Abdominal Wall Hernia Surgery.” Hernia, vol. 1, no. 1, 1997, pp. 15-21.
7. Bengtson, B., Baxter, R. A., Clemens, M. W., & Bates, D.C50. “A 12-month Survey of Early Use and Surgeon Satisfaction With a New Highly Purified Silk Matrix: SERI SurgicalScaffold.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, vol. 2, no. 7, 2014.
8. Corey R Deeken, PhD, et al. “Histologic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Crosslinked and Non-Crosslinked Biologic Meshes in a Porcine Model of Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair.” 23 Mar. 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3782991/
9. Deeken, Corey R., and Brent D. Matthews. “Characterization of the Mechanical Strength, Resorption Properties, and Histologic Characteristics of a Fully Absorbable Material (Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate—PHASIX Mesh) in a Porcine Model of Hernia Repair.” ISRN surgery, 2013.
10. “Wound Closure Manual.” Ethicon, Inc. PDF file. 2005.
11. Gross, John E., et al. “An Evaluation of SERI Surgical Scaffold for Soft-Tissue Support and Repair in an Ovine Model of Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 134, no. 5, 2014, pp.700e-704e.
12. “Chapter 7: Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) in Biomedical Applications and Tissue Engineering.” Biodegradable Polymers Volume 2, by Kai Guo and David Martin, 2015 NovaScience Publishers, Inc, 2015.
13. Halaweish, Ihab, et al. “Novel In Vitro Model for Assessing Susceptibility of Synthetic Hernia Repair Meshes to Staphylococcus Aureus Infection Using Green Fluorescent Protein-Labeled Bacteria and Modern Imaging Techniques.” Surgical Infections, vol. 11, no. 5, 2010, pp. 449-454.
14. Hjort, H., et al. “Three-Year Results From a Preclinical Implantation Study of a Long-Term Resorbable Surgical Mesh with Time-Dependent Mechanical Characteristics.” Hernia, vol. 16, no. 2, 2012, pp. 191-197.
15. Klinge U, Junge K, Spellerberg B, Piroth C, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V. “Do Multifilament Alloplastic Meshes Increase the Infection Rate? Analysis of the Polymeric Surface, the Bacteria Adherence, and the In Vivo Consequences in a Rat Model.” J Biomed Mater Reserve, vol. 63, no. 6, 2002, pp. 765-71.
16. Martin, D P, et al. “Characterization of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh for Hernia Repair Applications.” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 184, no. 2, 2013, pp. 766–773.
17. Martin, David P., and Simon F. Williams. “Medical Applications of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate: a Strong Flexible Absorbable Biomaterial.” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, 2003, pp. 97-105.
18. Roth, J. S., et al. “Prospective Evaluation of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh in CDC Class L/High-Risk Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: 18-Month Follow-Up.” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 32 no. 4, 2013, pp. 1929-1936.
19. Scott, J. R., Deeken, C. R., Martindale, R. G., Rosen, M. J. “Evaluation of a Fully Absorbable Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate/Absorbable Barrier Composite Mesh in a Porcine Model of Ventral Hernia Repair.” Surgical Endoscopy, vol.
30, no. 9, 2016, pp. 3691-3701.
20. “Scaffold Electronic IFU.” SERI Surgical. https://www.allergan.com/.
21. “Mesh Electronic IFU.” Strattice Surgical. https://allergan-web-cdn prod.azureedge.net.
22. “Surgical Mesh Electronic IFU.” TIGR Surgical. http://novusscientific.com.
23. Williams, Simon F., Martin, David P., Moses, Arikha C. “The History of GalaFLEX P4HB Scaffold.” Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2016, pp. S33–S42.
24. Buell, Joseph F. “Initial Experience With Biologic Polymer Scaffold (Poly-4-Hydroxybuturate) in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.” Annals of Surgery, vol. 266, no. 1, 1 July 2017, pp. 185–188.
25. Cartmill, Barry T. “How Do Absorbable Sutures Absorb? A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Study of Tissue Reaction to Polyglactin 910 Sutures in Human Skin.” Orbit, vol. 33, no. 6, 2014, pp. 437–443.
26. Silva, Gayan S. De. “Lack of Identifiable Biologic Behavior in a Series of Porcine Mesh Explants.” Surgery, vol. 156, no. 1, 2014, pp. 183–189., doi:10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.011.
27. Vera, Martin. “Phases of Wound Healing: The Breakdown.” Wound Source. Accessed on Nov 13, 2020. www.woundsource.com"
28. Ana Cristina de Oliveira Gonzalez, Tila Fortuna Costa. “Wound healing - A literature review.” An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91(5):614-20.
29. SIA. DuraSorb Synthetic Mesh. Brochure Printed 20200512. HYPERLINK "http://www.siahealth.com" www.siahealth.com
30. SIA. DuraSorb Synthetic Mesh. Instructions for Use. SI-LS-0002 Rev 3. HYPERLINK "http://www.siahealth.com" www.siahealth.com
31. Levenson SM, Geever EF, Crowley LV, Oates JF 3rd, Berard CW, Rosen H. The Healing of Rat Skin Wounds. Ann Surg. 1965;161(2):293–308.